
A groundbreaking study challenges mainstream media narratives, revealing that armed citizens frequently outperform police in neutralizing active shooter threats.
Key Insights
- Civilians have been more effective than police at stopping active shooters.
- Studies show armed civilians make fewer mistakes during crises.
- Data indicates civilians stopped 180 of 515 shootings reviewed.
- Findings highlight the crucial role of responsible gun owners.
Evidence of Civilian Effectiveness
It turns out, the expression “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” may be more true than we thought. Recent investigations into active shooter situations reveal a surprising pattern: armed civilians are effectively intervening, often more successfully than law enforcement. An analysis by John Lott Jr. from the Crime Prevention Research Center showcases crucial evidence that in many high-stakes scenarios, armed civilians have acted with measured precision, minimizing both casualties and errors.
Data from Lott’s study from 2014 to 2023 shows armed citizens successfully disrupted 180 out of 515 potential mass shootings. In scenarios where lawful carrying was allowed, permit holders stopped attacks 158 out of 307 times. Such statistics paint a striking picture of civilian intervention’s impact on active shooting situations.
Just weeks after GOA worked to repeal most of Wyoming's "Gun Free" zones in a historic win for Second Amendment rights, a new national study shows armed citizens are more likely to stop a mass shooting than police.
Armed citizens save lives!https://t.co/NlLGV5N5eT
— Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) March 17, 2025
Comparing with Law Enforcement
In conducting these studies, Lott emphasizes that civilians “stop more active shooters than police and do so with fewer mistakes” as documented by the CPRC. During the same period, law enforcement intervened in 156 cases but unfortunately, there were instances of mistaken identity that resulted in tragically preventable losses.
Additionally, police officers face considerable risk, with data indicating they are nearly six times more likely to be killed during interventions. This high level of danger highlights the critical role that brave patriots can play in protecting communities against threats, particularly when seconds can make all the difference.
A New Perspective on Second Amendment Rights
These findings prompt a reassessment of public perceptions regarding gun ownership, presenting concealed handgun permit holders not as reckless individuals but as vital protectors during crises. “These findings highlight a reality that is often ignored: responsible gun owners save lives,” Lott iterates. The study invigorates discussions around the Second Amendment, underscoring the importance of empowering responsible citizens to protect and defend their communities.
Lott emphasized the true message of this study: “These findings highlight a reality that is often ignored: responsible gun owners save lives. Concealed handgun permit holders aren’t reckless vigilantes, but they are law-abiding citizens who step up in moments of crisis when seconds matter and police are minutes away.”
As the mainstream media continues to muddy the waters in discussions about gun rights, personal safety, and law enforcement roles, this study adds a compelling component to the conversation. It’s a call to recognize the dual importance of preserving constitutional rights and promoting public safety through prepared and responsible gun ownership.
Sources:
- New Study Proves Armed Citizens Stop Mass Shootings
- Study: Concealed Carriers Do A Better Job Of Stopping Active Shooters Than Police
- Study: Concealed Carriers Stop More Active Shooters Than Police Do
- The Effects of Concealed-Carry Laws | RAND